Gifts and Hospitality Policy for Employees and Elected Members - Equality Screening
S75 Equality And Good Relations Screening Form
General Information |
Service/ Function ☐ |
Policy/ Procedure ☒ |
Project ☐ |
Strategy ☐ |
Plan ☐ |
Guidance ☐ |
Is this an existing, revised or a new function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance? Existing ☐ Revised ☐ New ☒ |
Operational Area | Corporate Services |
Title | Gifts and Hospitality Policy for Employees and Elected Members |
Brief Summary
|
What is it trying to achieve? (intended aims and outcomes)
The main aims of the Gifts and Hospitality Policy are to:
|
Who owns and who implements each element of the function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance? Elected Members should:
Officers, agency, secondees, consultants and contractors who may be working on Council's behalf should:
Directors should: |
Other policies etc. which have a bearing on this function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance?
|
Available Evidence Evidence to help inform the screening process may take many forms. Public authorities should ensure that their screening decision is informed by relevant data. What evidence/information (both qualitative and quantitative have you gathered to inform this function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance? Specify details for relevant Section 75 categories. |
It is proposed that all Section 75 categories will be considered via:
|
Section 75 Category | Details of Evidence/Information The policy is purely administrative/ procedural in nature and will have no bearing in terms of its likely impact on equality of opportunity or good relations for people within the S75 categories. |
Religious Beliefs |
As above |
Political Opinion |
As above |
Racial Group |
As above |
Age |
As above |
Marital Status | As above |
Sexual Orientation |
As above |
Men and Women Generally |
As above |
Dependants |
As above |
Disability |
As above |
Screening Questions 1. What is the likely impact on equality of opportunity for those affected by this function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance? |
Section 75 Category | Positive impact |
Neutral | Negative impact |
Reason | |
Gender | Women | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
The policy is purely administrative/ procedural in nature and will have no bearing in terms of its likely impact on equality of opportunity or good relations for people within the equality and good relations categories. |
Men | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
||
Transgender men/women | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
||
Other please specify | ☐ | ☐ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
||
Race (As used in the 2011 census) |
Asian | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
As above. |
Black | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
||
Chinese | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
||
Mixed race White |
☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
||
Other please specify | ☐ | ☐ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
||
Disability | Long term health impairment could include mental health problems, asthma, heart conditions, chronic fatigue etc. | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
As above. |
Sexual orientation | Heterosexual, lesbian, gay men, bisexual, others | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
As above. |
Age | Older People | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
|
Younger people and children | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
||
Political Opinion | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
As above. | |
Religious Belief | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
As above. | |
Marital Status | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
As above. | |
Dependants | ☐ | ☒ | Major ☐ Minor ☐ |
As above. |
|
Screening Questions 2. Are there opportunities to better promote equality of opportunity for people within any of the Section 75 categories? |
Section 75 Category | If Yes, provide details | If No, provide details | ||
Gender | Women | The policy is purely administrative/ procedural in nature and will have no bearing in terms of its likely impact on equality of opportunity or good relations for people within the equality and good relations categories. | ||
Men | ||||
Transgender men/women | ||||
Other please specify | ||||
Race As used in the 2011 census. |
Asian | As above. | ||
Black | ||||
Chinese | ||||
Mixed race White | ||||
Other please specify | ||||
Disability | Long term health impairment could include mental health problems, asthma, heart conditions, chronic fatigue etc. | As above. | ||
Sexual orientation | Heterosexual, lesbian, gay men, bisexual, others |
As above. |
||
Age | Older People, Younger people and children |
As above. | ||
Political Opinion | As above. | |||
Religious Belief | As above. | |||
Marital Status | As above. | |||
Dependants | As above. |
Screening Questions 3. To what extent is the policy likely to impact on good relations between people of different religious belief, political opinion or racial group? |
Section 75 Category | Details of policy impact | Level of impact major/minor/none |
Religious Belief | The policy is purely administrative/ procedural in nature and will have no bearing in terms of its likely impact on equality of opportunity or good relations for people within the equality and good relations categories. | None. |
Political Opinion | As above. | None. |
Racial Group | As above. | None. |
Screening Questions 4. Are there opportunities to better promote good relations between people of different religious belief, political opinion or racial group? |
Section 75 Category | If Yes, provide details | If No, provide details |
Religious Belief | The policy is purely administrative/ procedural in nature and will have no bearing in terms of its likely impact on equality of opportunity or good relations for people within the equality and good relations categories. | |
Political Opinion | As above. | |
Racial Group | As above. |
Additional Considerations | |
Generally speaking people can fall into more than one Section 75 category. Taking this into consideration, are there any potential impacts of the function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance on people with multiple identities? (For example: disabled minority ethnic people, disabled women, young Protestant men, young lesbians, gay and bisexual people.) No. |
|
Provide details of data on the impact of the function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance on people with multiple identities. Specify the relevant Section 75 categories concerned. | |
-- | |
Disability Considerations Is there an opportunity to better promote positive attitudes towards disabled people by altering this function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance? ☐ Yes ☒ No |
|
If yes, please give further information and examples: -- |
|
Is there an opportunity to encourage participation by disabled people in public life by altering this function, service, policy, procedure, project, strategy, plan or guidance? ☐ Yes ☒ No |
|
Please give further information and examples: -- |
|
Screening Decision
No mitigation required. |
|
If the decision is not to conduct an equality impact assessment (i.e. likely impact = None), please provide details of the reasons for this: The policy is purely administrative/ procedural in nature and will have no bearing in terms of its likely impact on equality of opportunity or good relations for people within the equality and good relations categories. |
|
Mitigation | |
When the Council concludes that the likely impact is ‘Minor’ and an equality impact assessment is not to be conducted, the Council may consider mitigation to lessen the severity of any equality impact, or the introduction of an alternative policy to better promote equality of opportunity or good relations. Can the policy/decision be amended or changed or an alternative policy introduced to better promote equality of opportunity and/or good relations? ☐ Yes ☒ No |
|
If YES, give the reasons to support your decision, together with the proposed changes/amendments or alternative policy: --- |
|
Timetabling And Prioritising | |
If the policy/decision has been ‘screened in’ for equality impact assessment, then please answer the following questions to determine its priority for timetabling the equality impact assessment. On a scale of 1 to 3, with 1 being the lowest priority and 3 the highest, assess the policy in terms of its priority for equality impact assessment. |
|
Priority Criterion | Rating (1 to 3) |
Effect on equality of opportunity and good relations | N/A |
Social Need | N/A |
Effect on people’s daily lives | N/A |
Relevance to the Council’s functions | N/A |
Monitoring | |
Please outline proposals for future monitoring of the policy/decision: The policy will be reviewed biannually or sooner to ensure it remains reflective of legislative developments. |
|
Approval And Authorisation | |
Screened By Position/Job Title Date | Date |
Democratic and Central Services Manager | 20/10/2021 |
Approved By Position/Job Title Date | |
Director of Corporate Services | 21/10/21 |
*Sources:
Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey (NILT), Queen’s University Belfast and the Ulster University NI Life and Times Survey - 2019 : ORIENT2 (ark.ac.uk)
https://www.ark.ac.uk/elections/nlgccg.htm
Northern Ireland Statistics website: www.nisra.gov.uk
2019 Mid Year Population Estimates for Northern Ireland | Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (nisra.gov.uk)
Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO.
----------------